Google+’s Rough Journey Ahead

For a little more that a week now I’ve been using Google’s recently unveiled social network Google+.

It’s been a service long time coming, as it is not the first social network Google has put out. In the heydays of MySpace there was Orkut, which never ever really caught on, to this day I have never heard it spoken out loud in the States. Then there was Google Buzz which quickly had some lawsuits thrown at it that Google lost. Not long after that there was Google Wave which seemed to be more of a social collaboration suite than anything, I don’t think it ever even totally got out to the public.

However successful those products were (which they weren’t really), we now have Google+ which has been taking the web by storm! Tech pundits, bloggers, and economists alike have been raving about what it means for the company, Facebook and the web as a whole. So far I really like it over Facebook, the design is clean and consistent with the new theme Google is rolling out across their sites (see the new gmail look and CosmicPanda YouTube channel layout).

There are furthermore some stupendously ingenious UI features, being able to go through photo albums with the scroll wheel is a joy! You can also view more detailed metadata of the photos, like model of camera that was used and the f-stop etc. Haven’t tried Hangouts yet (because there aren’t too many people on which I’ll talk about later) but they look cool.

The idea of circles is a huge benefit for me, if you’ve ever tried to friend me on Facebook and I have not met you in real life or we’ve never really gotten to know each other, I will not accept the invite. On Google+ I just drag you into one of my circles that’s applicable and you’ll get a confirmation that you’re in one of my circles. You won’t know which circle, which is odd in itself, I’ve heard from one of my friends that he even got rid of the standard circles and made up the nine circles of hell from Dante’s Inferno. Humourous as it may be I can only wonder which circle I’m in.

However there’s still just one thing missing from the whole experience: people, you know the part of the network that makes it social. It’s like playing on a Minecraft server with four other people who don’t log on and build or talk to you much. This is where the title of this post comes in. Google+ has a long way to go, fancy UI features and design alone won’t bring people on board. The basic challenge is how do you draw people away from Facebook? I think what it will come down to is a few “key people” in a group of friends. I’ve written out two scenarios based based on this idea and and drawn from the fictional friend network below.

 

What “Lost”? no not at all, I know where I’m going with this. Here we have a network of friends on Facebook, granted it’s a very scaled down model, but let’s say this is ALL of Facebook.

Scenario 1: Jacob (he’s a little unpopular with only one friend) get’s Google+ loves it and uses it. Having no friends on there where’s the motivation or incentive for others to adopt? Richard might, half his friends just left him on Facebook. So Richard joins Jacob on Google+, Ben who now only has one friend (note: a popular one though) also follows the two on to Google+. Now there is still a large majority on Facebook, none of them even really care that these three people left Facebook however, Locke the most popular person here just lost one friend to the service. Through this model, the viral chain of adoption stops there and Jacob, Richard, and Ben all have Google+ to themselves.

Scenario 2: Locke leaves Facebook and carries all his photos over to Google+ because he just likes it a whole lot more and that it’s his destiny! Holy cow! Locke has pictures of everyone and everything they’ve done together, suddenly five friends just lost a bunch of photo data, this super cool popular guy just swtiched to Google+ maybe they should too? There’s now an incentive and motivation for others to switch. Within a couple of days, the whole network is on Google+, then Jack starts saying that they have to go back but no one really listens because they’re all already there.

Scenario 1 is essentially what’s happening on Google+ right now, a few tech savvy people who don’t really like Facebook to begin with have switched over but don’t really have enough voice among their group of friends to get everyone else over. To make matters more complicated you have to still be invited to the service from someone who already uses it. Scenario 2 is the challenge Google must rise to, getting those “popular” people off of Facebook and on to Google+. Of course everyone is not and early adopter and switcher like Locke, a lot of the people I’ve seen just try out Google+ to see what it’s like, I know no one who has converted entirely. Some things are just popular because they got to it and put themselves out there first, Internet Explorer, HuskyStarcraft, and Facebook. IE shows that it’s hard to draw people away even though there are better things out there; others, like Firefox and Chrome, have show that its possible though. Not the best example because those are just browsers, no interactivity between friends, if you switch browsers, there’s no social repercussion, when you leave Facebook, especially if you’re “popular”, you will leave waves where you once were; and your friends will balk at you in real life like you don’t have a cell phone or something (hopefully a minor exaggeration).

These challenges are hopefully known, and anticipated. In the end Google+ will take some time to get better and more people to adopt it, but it’s certainly possible and if any company can do it, it’s Google. Godspeed Google!

Mac’s Galore

Sitting in my high school’s library now, looking around it’s slightly surprising to me that Apple only has an 8% market share. I see two MacBooks, two MacBook Pros, and 5 various models of the iPod.* Many of you may or may not know in the end of October 2008 I bought the $1600 MacBook, and even dual booted Windows XP on it. While yes I admit the prices on their hardware is pretty ridiculous, and I could have gotten a much more powerful components, a much larger screen for the same price or even less, and the glass screen is a good warning mirror in case anyone sneaks up on me, what I got for the price I paid seems a little more fair now.

Having had it for almost three months, I can sufficiently say that I am rather satisfied. Windows runs games and such perfectly on the 70gb partition I made for it, and although the trackpad isn’t very compatible that is easily fixed with a good notebook mouse.

Yesterday, some friends and I pitched in $25 in order to split  4/5 licenses of iWork ’09. Originally I was skeptical about the software, I watched the Apple keynote revealing the revised Office suite and wasn’t too impressed. However actually trying it out on my own computer has been an experience. Initially I had used Open Office write, which while works, can be difficult sometimes, I got it so I wouldn’t have to pay more re-purchase MS Office and I considered it to out rank the suite overall. Now having tried iWork extensively, the ranks of Word Processors go from worst to best: MS Office, Open Office, iWork. For anyone who has a Mac already and is tired of using a clunky interface on such a beautiful machine, I recommend that you switch over, again you can split up the licenses as you wish.

The other software that comes on the Mac side, iLife ’08 in particular is also impressive, I have already used Garageband multiple times to create soundtracks for my videos, and I feel that they have come out with a level of professionality that a copyrighted song could not have given. iMovie is really a joy to use for short simple videos, responding to challenges on YouTube has never been easier, before my process would be slowed down over the course of about two hours per challenge.

My verdict: if you’re a fun loving student like me who games and does whatever whenever, then get a mac, you won’t regret it. If you’re just looking to get a good portable computer though just for browsing and word processing, get an HP Mini, I’ve tried them out from friends and in stores and they’re second to none in portability.

*I don’t care Zunes are still better, just wait until Songbird supports more mp3 players.